World Bugs: Issue Tracking

Bugs are made.

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Human Rights?

What are human rights?

This is a number of topics in itself. I'll start with the overview and I'll take each one up as the days go by.

To start:

THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (UDHR)


The abridged text (found here) covers things such as:

    1. We are all free and equal. We are all born free. We all have our own thoughts and ideas. We should all be treated in the same way.

    7. We are all protected by the law. The law is the same for everyone. It must treat us all fairly.

    25. A bed and some food. We all have the right to a good life. Mothers and children, people who are old, unemployed or disabled, and all people have the right to be cared for.

These are points in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (full text).

This document was adopted by the United Nations in 10 December, 1948. But did you know what document sais? How many people do you know have ever heard of the UDHR?

This is garenteed to all people, it is these rights which stand inalienable to anyone. Each one of them has been made into short films by human rights activist Teran Lexton with Youth for Human Rights International and the Church of Scientology International.

Thursday, October 05, 2006

Frivolous

It sure sounds need, and may well work out alright in hypertheoretical theoreticismismnessocity arts, but are we chasing butterflies this one?

Ok, we have a universe. What does that mean?

The theory goes it went boom and was, so is and will be until it isn't.


I don't know that I'm all that convinced. Lumpy radiation? I've had lumpy soup that sounds considerably more complicated and pertinent to existence then the possible of warmth, over there.

This is an estimation based on estimation (so it appears):

I estimate the universe went boom and so is X years ago. I believe we're spotted lumpy warmth off the port bow in 16 billion year old light. And if there is anything behind that and farther away at more distant time, we won't distribute the records until further...testing, yess, testing."


The questions surrounding the whys and wherefores of the universe are likely to be general and probabl a bit awing - after all, we haven't confronted this sector of planet let alone the uniervse as a whole in a long time.

Round about way of getting to it sure, but I'd keep an eye for this: frivolous on planet bickering between people, groups and nations when we have a whole galaxy and universe to salvage. Would you be inclined to do something about it?

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Frivolous

It sure sounds need, and may well work out alright in hypertheoretical theoreticismismnessocity arts, but are we chasing butterflies this one?

Ok, we have a universe. What does that mean?

The theory goes it went boom and was, so is and will be until it isn't.


I don't know that I'm all that convinced. Lumpy radiation? I've had lumpy soup that sounds considerably more complicated and pertinent to existence then the possible of warmth, over there.

This is an estimation based on estimation (so it appears):

I estimate the universe went boom and so is X years ago. I believe we're spotted lumpy warmth off the port bow in 16 billion year old light. And if there is anything behind that and farther away at more distant time, we won't distribute the records until further...testing, yess, testing."


The questions surrounding the whys and wherefores of the universe are likely to be general and probabl a bit awing - after all, we haven't confronted this sector of planet let alone the uniervse as a whole in a long time.

Round about way of getting to it sure, but I'd keep an eye for this: frivolous on planet bickering between people, groups and nations when we have a whole galaxy and universe to salvage. Would you be inclined to do something about it?

Sunday, October 01, 2006

Is moon landing quote grammatically incorrect?

Did he say that or something else?

Press here to have _____ say whatever you want!


Scary note on that one, a software program can provide some insight as what people were "actually saying" or to say exactly what would been the correct response and making that what was "actually said." The officiallity of a sound bite ruined over the last many many years. This gives a necissesity for watermarks or a similar kind of ensurance aspect of a the bite to convince you it's the real deal, up and above what is in common use now. Keep an eye out for it and push honesty, shall we?