Buffalo slammed by snow; 380,000 lose power

This is all to indicative of technology not keeping up.

In this I am really talking about things such as lasers and hendheld heatbeam generators.

Heat beam could have been being engineer sincle the release of Superman in Action Comics.

Lasers seems to have been developed somewhat but not for right things quite yet.

Priorty as the above showed - the laser snow shovel. It could be similar in many ways to the shovel but instead of lifting or moving it will be concentrated on vaporizing utterly and completed.

How about the heat beams? Unlimited use: cold food, frozen shut itemry and drying stuff.

These technologies need to get under way right away.

Nice pyramid

Mexico to Yahoo: Not on our pyramid

This is one of those pick your path kind of adventures:

• Multi-million dollar company wants to shoot lasers into space


• Historical society stopping cool projects all the time

Bush, Other Leaders Rebuke North Korea

Bugger.

Why is it thought to be a good idea using nuclear weaponry?

It's likely we could lose this planet (a small one I might add) using that kind of crap.

This planet was not made to operate with that kind of crap. Even if the intention was to a nail particular group or nation, the effects of fallout alone would be farther spread than would be intended by any interested party.

The likelyhood of tactical nuclear weaponry is slim in my opinion. It has not yet shown through to me that tactical usage has been the point of testing. That would be bad still, it's use being so sporadic that entire areas would be under quarentine do to a lack of knownledge on the state of it's contamination. From the seeming lack of danger apparent from gorilla-like battlegrounds it would likely lure more to sickness and disease accomanying occupation of areas like that.

Oh ya, you could also blow a chunk out of the planet and knock the axis...or burn a hole severe enough in the ozone to endanger life on the planet as a whole.

So I guess there is not too much going against doing this kind of thing - just ape level logic on the survival of any creature on the planet.

My message to those involved:

Knock of the tiddly-winks with the people of this planet, we don't need it.

Understanding memory loss

I'll give this one an old off the cuff answer:

It's probably because we don't want to remember or else we would.

What makes it that you can't "remember" something? Take for that question, "what makes that you can't see something"?

• It isn't there


• Your viewing equipment (eyes) are damager


• You won't look at it

Well what about memory? Take it one step back with what is the mind? Lay the playing field by going to this FAQ on Scientology Today. With that out of the way, you eyes won't change the seen unnles you've never seen it. And it's probably there. So what's the case? You are not looking at it.

You're not an only one in this but don't take my word for it, if it's true for you it's true.