U.S. announces troop deployments to Iraq

U.S. announces troop deployments to Iraq: We are dragging things out here.

The cumulative population of Iraq is less than that of California. Obviously there is no need or want to do some mass obliteration. But given the sheer numbers, why even bother? It's counter survival. Maybe we could campaign that, why don't we campaign peaceful relations with Iraq. Like

Why keep up the fight? Work to rebuild, establish and maintain fair relations. The numbers we can but fight not to expend are too great for the lands of Iraq, we are working for the survival of this planet dag nabbit.

Know what I mean?

Blogged with Flock

Bush meets with panel on course of Iraq war

Bush says panel members want America to succeed in Iraq, just as he does.

Do YOU know what success means in this war? Has it been laid down target by target (as in a plan, not a place we're aiming at), what needs to be done on RIGHT NOW to accomplish "success?" I don't know what we're going for.

If we had a terminable goal in mind we would have just done it, the opposition is not so great as to be insurmountable by the U.S.A. The U.S.A. is a powerful nation and if done smartly with the correct force in the correct places, the time necessitated to execute a war plan to a terminable done would not be that long. It's as if we're doing holding actions for lack of something to the point to do, I think that's gross.

SeaMonkey

With such an enticing package name such as "SeaMonkey," the unfortunate truth accompanying such a beauty if in fact that it uncomfortably settles itselfs into the category of notworking on my machine.

"Why is this?" one might ask. One would soon see it is likely a lack of professionalism, that is taken from the viewpoint of a consumer expecting the goods.

From the viewpoint of myself, an FC5 user, it's really more a of a slight frustration and the response, "what did I do wrong?"

I'm yumming this one now and hoping for the best, I'll let you know.